Posted by: Patricia Salkin | March 27, 2009

Court Finds City Failed to Prove Transient Use Constituted a Violation of Zoning Resolution

An appeals court overturned a preliminary injunction against three residential buildings in the Upper West Side of New York City that had ordered them to stop using the SROs (single room occupancy) as transient hotels. The Court determined that the City did not show if would ultimately success in proving that the transient use actually constitutes a violation of either the City Zoning Resolution or the certificates of occupancy. The rental of a small number of units for non-permanent use does not, said the court, violate the Zoning Resolution or the certificate, since there is no requirement that the buildings be used exclusively for permanent occupancy. Further, the Court noted that the definition of the words “transient” and “permanent” contained in the Zoning Resolution are vague.  

 

New York City v. 330 Continental 873 N.Y.S. 2d 9 (A.D. 1st Dept. 1/29/2009).

 

The opinion can be accessed at: http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2009/2009_00460.htm


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 242 other followers