Archive for January, 2010
Greenhouses, Cold Frames, and Pole Barn Did Not Qualify as Accessory Uses Under Applicable Zoning Ordinance
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on January 14, 2010
Church’s SRO Use Protected Under RLUIPA but Landmarking Law Did Not Violate RLUIPA
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on January 13, 2010
Commission Identification of RLUIPA Concerns Is Not Equivalent to Basing a Decision on RLUIPA
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on January 12, 2010
Zoning Ordinance Regarding Density May Not Conflict with Comprehensive Land Use Plan Recommended Maximum Density
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on January 11, 2010
Based on Decision in Previous Case, Plaintiff Estopped from Inverse Condemnation or Regulatory Taking Claim
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on January 10, 2010
Court Overturns ZBA Denial of Variance for an Accessory Garage Since it Lacked a Rational Basis and was Arbitrary and Capricious
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on January 9, 2010
Due Process Requires More Than Newspaper Notice of Zoning Change Where Addresses Are Readily Ascertainable
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on January 8, 2010
Building Applicant Responsible for Ensuring Conformity with Zoning Law and Town Not Estopped from Enforcing Ordinance
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on January 7, 2010
Indoor Shooting Range and Gun Training Facility Qualifies as Recreational Use Under Zoning Ordinance
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on January 6, 2010
Zoning Resolution Adopted in Accordance with County and not Township Plan is Valid Under Ohio Statute
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on January 5, 2010
