Posted by: Patricia Salkin | March 21, 2011

Indiana Supreme Court Holds Landfill Operator Not Required to Seek New Zoning Permit

A group of residents, some who own land close to the proposed landfill of J.M. Corporation (JMC), appealed the approval of the landfill’s permit for construction. The Madison County Board of Zoning Appeals granted the zoning petition in 1981.  Over the years, the company had been granted an operating permit by the Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM), but because of an appeal by the citizens association, the issue went back before the Indiana Office of Environmental Adjudication.  The parties met several times to attempt to finalize the operating permit, but their efforts failed and the matter was appealed again. The appeal was resolved when the Office of Environmental Adjudication ruled in October 2004 that an operating permit had been issued to JMC in 1998 and IDEM improperly denied JMC’s permit renewal application and request for extension of time. But a new law passed in March 2008 says a facility that didn’t accept waste before April 1, 2008, had to return to county zoning authorities for a new permit. JMC installed and operated a collection container system on its property and at the end of March 2008, it had received household trash from paying customers.

The citizens association sought a declaratory judgment in June 2008 that the new state law applied to JMC so it had to seek current zoning approval. The trial court granted JMC’s motion for summary judgment and denied the association’s motion for summary judgment. The trial court held that the statute violated the Indiana Constitution because it was a special law that could have been made to apply generally. It also ruled the collection container system didn’t constitute accepting waste.

In reversing the court below, the Indiana Supreme Court applied the recognized definitions of “facility,” “accept,” and “waste,” and unanimously held that the statute doesn’t apply to JMC because the landfill accepted waste before April 1, 2008. Furthermore, the Court said that the facility was only required to have “accepted” waste before the applicable deadline and the waste was not required to be deposited or disposed of as it would be in a landfill.

Killbuck Concerned Citizens Association v J.M. Corporation, 2011 WL 480532 (Ind. 2/10/2011)

The opinion can be accessed at: http://www.in.gov/judiciary/opinions/pdf/02101101fsj.pdf


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 242 other followers