Posted by: Patricia Salkin | August 9, 2012

Nevada Supreme Court Dismisses Regulatory Takings Claim on Ripeness Grounds

Appellants RB Properties, Inc. and South Pointe Properties, Inc., owned land in Laughlin, Nevada that they planned to develop into multiple resort hotels and casinos. In their takings challenge, the Court explained that a regulatory takings claim is not ripe unless the government entity charged with implementing the regulations has reached a final decision regarding the application of the regulations to the property at issue. RB Properties had only obtained H-1 zoning on part of its property and had not applied for any of the other land use approvals that Clark County Code required. Because they failed to submit the necessary land use applications, the takings claim is not ripe. Furthermore, even if RB Properties had obtained the necessary licenses and permits, that alone would be insufficient to comprise a constitutionally protected property right.

RB Properties, Inc. & South Pointe Properties, Inc. v. Clark County, 2012 WL 1911929 (NV  5/23/2012)

The opinion can be accessed at:

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s



Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 819 other followers

%d bloggers like this: