Archive for the ‘Comprehensive Plan’ Category
Miss. Appellate Court Affirms Grant of Variances and Rezone for PUD, finding Record Supported Permit
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on November 7, 2012
Idaho Supreme Court Upholds Standing for Petitioners Within One Mile Radius and States that Comprehensive Plan is a Guide and Not a Legally Controlling Zoning Law Requiring Strict Adherence
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on September 12, 2012
OH Appeals Court Holds Township’s 26-page Resolution Dividing Territory into Four Districts Constituted a “Comprehensive Plan” Under Statute
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on July 3, 2012
MD Court of Appeals Holds that When Development Regulations Incorporate Master Plan Compliance, The Master Plan itself Becomes a Regulatory Device
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on May 22, 2012
DE Chancery Court Hold Future Planning in Comprehensive Plan has Immediate Effect Resulting in a Ripe Claim Upon Adoption
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on February 28, 2012
MD Appeals Court Upholds Commission’s Findings as Consistent with the General Plan
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on December 14, 2011
Idaho Amends Comprehensive Plan Statute
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on September 25, 2011
Indiana Appeals Court Upholds BZA’s Denial of Conditional Use Permit for Expansion of Sewage Treatment Plant
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on August 27, 2011
MT Supreme Court Holds City Must Comply with its Own Growth Policy in Making Zoning Decisions
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on June 28, 2011
NY Appellate Court Upholds Denial of Special Use Permit for Parking
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on February 16, 2011
