Archive for the ‘Equitbale Estoppel’ Category
MS Supreme Court Finds Nothing in Covenants Restricting Use of Land for Church
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on September 7, 2012
NC Appeals Court Rules Board Had Authority to Issue Variance for Sign and That Applicant was Not Entitled to Vested Right Nor Was Town Barred by Estoppel or Laches From Enforcing Sign Law
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on August 21, 2011
MN Supreme Court Holds City is Not Equitably Estopped from Enforcing Zoning Ordinance
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on July 14, 2011
NY Appellate Court Holds Parking Lot Owner Precluded by Estoppel From Preventing Exclusive Use to Plaintiff Whose Variance Was Granted on Condition of Parking
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on May 22, 2011
NJ Appeals Court Upholds Variance Denial and Dismisses Equitable Estoppel Claim Where Plaintiffs Spent $35k on Addition in Reliance on Permit
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on January 25, 2011
TN Appeals Court Rules that Side Bar Conversations by City Officials do not Estopp City Council from Refusing to Take Action
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on November 3, 2010
Federal District Court (NY) Dismisses Due Process and Retaliation Claims, and Grants Leave to Amend Equal Protection Claim
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on October 1, 2010
Building Applicant Responsible for Ensuring Conformity with Zoning Law and Town Not Estopped from Enforcing Ordinance
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on January 7, 2010
Equitable Estoppel Does Not Apply Where Applicant Received Building Permit But Had Failed to Submit Required Development Plan Review
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on December 1, 2009
