Archive for the ‘Impact Fees’ Category
WA Appeals Court Holds Only Public Access Trail and Not Entire Conservation Easement Counts as Credit Towards Impact Fee
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on August 25, 2012
Ohio Supreme Court defines Township’s Assessments on New Developments as an Unauthorized Tax and not a Fee
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on June 14, 2012
New Utah Law Requires Localities to Provide Information About Development Review Fees
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on June 19, 2011
New Law in Colorado Requires Municipalities to Annually Post Impact Fee Information on Official Website
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on June 16, 2011
AL Supreme Court Upholds Water and Sewer Service Impact Fees
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on May 5, 2011
NC Appeals Court Finds Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance for Schools Unconstitutional
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on October 18, 2010
New Hampshire Supreme Court Holds that Town Was Not Authorized to Expend Full Amount of Performance Bond Filed by Developer
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on August 25, 2010
WI Appeals Court Holds that Challenges to Impact Fees Must First Use Appeal Process Provided in the Ordinance
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on August 24, 2010
CA. Appeals Court Upholds Development Impact Fees for Facilities That Had Not Yet Been Planned
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on July 28, 2010
VT Supreme Court Finds Cost of Tree Removal Should be Factored into Off-Site Mitigation Fee
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on July 26, 2010
