Posted by: Patricia Salkin | July 28, 2009

Variances Upheld as Board Applied Statutory Balancing Test

On appeal challenging the granting of area variances, the appellate court reminded that local zoning boards have a wide discretion in considering applications for area variances, and that judicial review is limited to determining whether the action taken by the board was illegal, arbitrary and capricious, or an abuse of discretion.  Relying on Town Law § 267-b(3)(b) and Matter of Sasso v. Osgood, which put forth and explained the criteria a zoning board must balance when determining whether or not an area variance should be granted, the Court concluded that the zoning board properly engaged in the required balancing test, and that its determination to grant the variances had a rational basis and was not arbitrary and capricious. 

Celentano v. Board of Zoning Appeals of the Town of Brookhaven, 2009 WL 1885915 (N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept. 6/30/2009).

 The opinion can be accessed at:

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: