Posted by: Patricia Salkin | July 20, 2015

Fed. Dist. Court in MA Reverses ZBA’s Denial of Permits for Wireless Communications Tower

Plaintiff sought to vacate the zoning board of appeals’ decision to deny an application for a zoning permit for a wireless communications tower. Plaintiff argued that the application denial was not supported by “substantial evidence,” and has the practical effect of “prohibiting the provision of personal wireless services” in contravention of the Telecommunications Act of 1996. The court agreed with the plaintiffs that the ZBA’s decision was not supported by “substantial evidence” because it made its decision using federal standards and not town by-laws. Further, the court held that plaintiffs made an adequate showing that there was a significant gap in wireless coverage in the area which was subject to the permit, and there were no feasible alternatives for a tower in the area. Thus, the ZBA was ordered to issue the permits.

Indus. Tower & Wireless, LLC v. Haddad, 2015 WL 2365560, (D. Mass. 5/18/2015)


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

%d bloggers like this: