Archive for December 31st, 2015
AZ Appeals Court Finds Appellant was Not Unconstitutionally Disadvantaged by Application of an Unconstitutional Burden of Proof in Nonconforming Use Matter
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on December 31, 2015
LAW OF THE LAND
A blog on land use law and zoning
Contact the Author
- Click here.
For the Author’s Publications
Categories
- Access to Government (26)
- Accessory Uses (48)
- ADA (36)
- Adequate Public Facilities Ordinances (1)
- Adult Entertainment Facilities (125)
- Aesthetics (4)
- Affordable Housing (65)
- Aging (1)
- Agricultural Uses (97)
- Airports (7)
- Alcohol Sales (7)
- Alienation of parkland (1)
- Amending Zoning (19)
- Annexation (21)
- Architectural Review Board (2)
- Attorney Work Product (1)
- Authority (21)
- Authority to Zone (4)
- Big Box/Formula Retail (9)
- Book Reviews (11)
- Brownfields (1)
- Building Codes (9)
- Cemeteries (3)
- Climate Change (59)
- Collateral Estoppel (5)
- Comprehensive Plan (77)
- Condemnation/Eminent Domain (82)
- Conditions on Approval (16)
- Consent Decree (1)
- Conservation Easements (3)
- Constructive Approval (2)
- Contract Zoning (6)
- Current Caselaw (2,378)
- Current Caselaw – New York (1,112)
- Declaratory Relief (13)
- Definitions (44)
- Density Bonus (1)
- Development Agreements (9)
- Development Rights Agreements (2)
- Discrimination (10)
- Docks (5)
- Drones (2)
- Dual Zone Parcel (1)
- Due Process (293)
- Easements (9)
- Educational Use (5)
- Endangered Species (5)
- Energy (8)
- Enforcement (147)
- Environmental Justice (22)
- Environmental Review (60)
- Equal Protection (203)
- Equitable Estoppel (17)
- Estoppel (7)
- Ethics (239)
- Exactions (18)
- Exclusionary Zoning (4)
- Exemption from Zoning (3)
- Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies (9)
- Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (2)
- Fair Housing Act Amendments (59)
- Family (12)
- Federal Preemption (3)
- Fees (5)
- FHA (18)
- Final Decisions (3)
- Financing (1)
- Findings (3)
- first amendment (46)
- Floating Zones (2)
- Flood Control (7)
- FOIL (2)
- Food Trucks (1)
- Formula Retail (1)
- Fracking (7)
- GIS (2)
- Growth Management (2)
- Hearings (1)
- Highways and Roads (1)
- Historic Preservation (71)
- Home Occupations (21)
- Homeland Security (1)
- Host Community Agreements (1)
- Hours of Operation (1)
- Housing (1)
- Immunity (24)
- Impact Fees (22)
- Incentive Zoning (1)
- Injunctive Relief (27)
- Intergovernmental Conflicts (5)
- Intervention (1)
- inverse condemnation (1)
- Judicial Abstention (2)
- Junkyards (8)
- Jurisdiction (7)
- Laches (9)
- Legislative vs Adjudicatory (2)
- Lot Merger (13)
- Mandamus (17)
- Marcellus Shale Gas Drilling (10)
- Mediation (1)
- Medical Marijuana (55)
- Mining (33)
- Mobile Homes (20)
- Mootness (15)
- moratoria (30)
- Necessary Parties (18)
- New Legislation (73)
- New York (7)
- Non-Conforming Uses (240)
- Notice (10)
- Notice of Decision (3)
- Nuisance (51)
- Oceans (1)
- official map (3)
- Open Meetings (42)
- Overlay Zone (2)
- Paper Streets (1)
- Performance Bond (6)
- Pine Barrens (1)
- Planned Development Districts (38)
- Players in the Land Use Game (4)
- Preemption (124)
- Prior Precedent (1)
- Procedural Issues (60)
- Property Rights (8)
- Public Trust Doctrine (1)
- Purchase of Development Rights (2)
- qualified immunity (1)
- Records (9)
- Redevelopment (13)
- Referenda (32)
- Regional Planning (5)
- Religious Uses – Non-RLUIPA (43)
- Remedies (1)
- Res Judicata (22)
- Residency Restrictions (14)
- Restrictive Covenants (30)
- Retaliation (24)
- Retroactive Application (7)
- Rezoning (97)
- Ripeness (136)
- RLUIPA (237)
- Robert's Rule of Order (1)
- Rooker-Feldman Doctrine (1)
- Second Amendment (3)
- Section 1983 Liability (58)
- Senior Housing (21)
- Setback Requirement (2)
- Short Term Rentals (20)
- sign (1)
- Signs (199)
- Site Plan Review (64)
- SLAPP Suits (4)
- Smart Growth (14)
- solar energy (14)
- Special Facts Exception (1)
- Special Use/Exception (216)
- Spot Zoning (37)
- Standards of Review (22)
- Standing (190)
- Statewide Planning (1)
- Statute of Limitations (72)
- Straddled Parcels (3)
- Student Housing (7)
- Subdivision Regulation (101)
- Takings (287)
- tatoo parlors (1)
- Time of Application Rule (1)
- Transfer of Development Rights (8)
- Uncategorized (636)
- Uniformity (2)
- Urbanism (1)
- Utilities (2)
- Vagueness (5)
- Variances (383)
- Vested Rights (88)
- Voting (8)
- Waivers (1)
- Wetlands (1)
- Wind Development (70)
- Wireless Communications (162)
- Younger Abstention Doctrine (1)
- Zoning – Interpretation (136)
- Zoning Administration (29)
- Zoning Boards of Appeal (10)
- Zoning Map (5)
- Zoning-Adopting/Amending (21)
Archives
Blogroll
- Agricultural Law
- Bulldozers at Your Doorstep
- Climate Law Blog
- Community Benefits Agreements
- Endangered Species Act Law Blog
- Environmental Justice – EPA
- Environmental Justice Blog
- Envirosphere
- Gideon’s Trumpet
- Green Building Law Blog
- Green Building Law Update
- Green Law Blog
- Green Real Estate Law
- Hawaii Land Use Law
- IMLA Blog
- Impact Fees.com
- Inverse Condemnation
- Land Use Law Professor Blog
- Land Use, Environmental and Real Estate Law in California
- Lay of the Land – CA
- LI Land Use and Zoning
- Massachussetts Land Use Monitor
- Midwest Planning BLUZ
- National Eminent Domain Blog
- New Jersey Condemnation Law
- New Jersey Land Use Law
- New York Legal Update
- New York Zoning and Municipal Law Blog
- NJ Eminent Domain Law
- North Carolina Legal Landscapes
- North Carolna Land Use Litigator
- Northwest Land Law Forum
- NY Times City Room:Land Use Planning
- Open Space – Vermont Land Use Law & Policy
- Preservation Law Digest
- Property Professor Blog
- Rhode Island Property Law
- RLUIPA Defense
- Scenic America Blog
- SCOTUSblog
- Teaching Climate Change Law & Policy
- The Eminent Domain Law Blog
- The Florida Land Environment
- Touro Law Institute on Land Use and Sustainable Development Law Blog
- Tucson Land Use Law
- Utah Office of Property Rights Ombudsman
- Vermont Environmental and Land Use Law Blog
- Warming Law
- Wind Power Law
Disclaimer
This blog is provided for general informational purposes only. It should not be construed as legal advice and is not intended to be a substitute for legal counsel. Persons requiring legal advice should retain a properly licensed lawyer. No attorney-client relationship will be formed based on use of this site and any comments or posts to this blog will not be privileged or confidential.
BLOG STATS
