Posted by: Patricia Salkin | February 17, 2017

PA Court Holds Board Member’s Statement Opposing Project Did Not Constitute Bias nor Did it Embolden Objectors

Pennswood applied for a variance to operate a step-down facility for recovering substance abusers in a medium density residential district. At the hearing, one of the Board members, Ms. Wardell, stated that she did not believe that the step-down facility belonged in the residential area. Pennswood argued that her statement “emboldened the ‘tone, and content’ of the objectors’ subjective statements,” causing the Board to take the objectors’ side and disregard Pennswood’s evidence. The court held that there was no evidence that the statement constituted bias or that it emboldened the objectors.

Pennswood Manor Real Estate Assocs., LLC v. Zoning Hearing Bd. of City of Scranton, 2015 WL 5671857(Pa. Commw. Ct. 9/24/2015).


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

%d bloggers like this: