Archive for April 8th, 2017
RI Supreme Court Quashes Decision to Deny Victualing Licenses at Historic Mansions Finding City Council Failed to Provide Reasons Relied on to Reach Decision
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on April 8, 2017
LAW OF THE LAND
A blog on land use law and zoning
Contact the Author
- Click here.
For the Author’s Publications
Categories
- Access to Government (20)
- Accessory Uses (43)
- ADA (29)
- Adequate Public Facilities Ordinances (1)
- Adult Entertainment Facilities (120)
- Aesthetics (2)
- Affordable Housing (62)
- Aging (1)
- Agricultural Uses (84)
- Airports (6)
- Alcohol Sales (7)
- Alienation of parkland (1)
- Amending Zoning (18)
- Annexation (19)
- Architectural Review Board (2)
- Attorney Work Product (1)
- Authority (20)
- Authority to Zone (4)
- Big Box/Formula Retail (9)
- Book Reviews (11)
- Brownfields (1)
- Building Codes (9)
- Cemeteries (2)
- Climate Change (58)
- Collateral Estoppel (4)
- Comprehensive Plan (66)
- Condemnation/Eminent Domain (73)
- Conditions on Approval (16)
- Consent Decree (1)
- Conservation Easements (3)
- Constructive Approval (2)
- Contract Zoning (6)
- Current Caselaw (2,377)
- Current Caselaw – New York (987)
- Declaratory Relief (13)
- Definitions (37)
- Density Bonus (1)
- Development Agreements (8)
- Development Rights Agreements (1)
- Discrimination (9)
- Docks (5)
- Drones (1)
- Dual Zone Parcel (1)
- Due Process (257)
- Easements (9)
- Educational Use (4)
- Endangered Species (5)
- Energy (7)
- Enforcement (135)
- Environmental Justice (22)
- Environmental Review (50)
- Equal Protection (186)
- Equitable Estoppel (15)
- Estoppel (7)
- Ethics (203)
- Exactions (17)
- Exclusionary Zoning (4)
- Exemption from Zoning (3)
- Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies (5)
- Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (2)
- Fair Housing Act Amendments (53)
- Family (12)
- Federal Preemption (3)
- Fees (4)
- FHA (11)
- Final Decisions (3)
- Financing (1)
- Findings (3)
- first amendment (35)
- Floating Zones (2)
- Flood Control (5)
- FOIL (2)
- Formula Retail (1)
- Fracking (7)
- GIS (2)
- Growth Management (2)
- Highways and Roads (1)
- Historic Preservation (58)
- Home Occupations (19)
- Homeland Security (1)
- Host Community Agreements (1)
- Hours of Operation (1)
- Housing (1)
- Immunity (16)
- Impact Fees (20)
- Incentive Zoning (1)
- Injunctive Relief (23)
- Intergovernmental Conflicts (3)
- inverse condemnation (1)
- Judicial Abstention (2)
- Junkyards (6)
- Jurisdiction (7)
- Laches (5)
- Legislative vs Adjudicatory (2)
- Lot Merger (12)
- Mandamus (15)
- Marcellus Shale Gas Drilling (10)
- Mediation (1)
- Medical Marijuana (47)
- Mining (30)
- Mobile Homes (18)
- Mootness (10)
- moratoria (26)
- Necessary Parties (15)
- New Legislation (73)
- New York (7)
- Non-Conforming Uses (223)
- Notice (10)
- Notice of Decision (2)
- Nuisance (43)
- Oceans (1)
- official map (3)
- Open Meetings (35)
- Overlay Zone (1)
- Paper Streets (1)
- Performance Bond (6)
- Pine Barrens (1)
- Planned Development Districts (36)
- Players in the Land Use Game (2)
- Preemption (115)
- Prior Precedent (1)
- Procedural Issues (58)
- Property Rights (8)
- Purchase of Development Rights (2)
- qualified immunity (1)
- Records (7)
- Redevelopment (11)
- Referenda (31)
- Regional Planning (5)
- Religious Uses – Non-RLUIPA (38)
- Remedies (1)
- Res Judicata (14)
- Residency Restrictions (13)
- Restrictive Covenants (27)
- Retaliation (22)
- Retroactive Application (7)
- Rezoning (78)
- Ripeness (118)
- RLUIPA (215)
- Robert's Rule of Order (1)
- Rooker-Feldman Doctrine (1)
- Second Amendment (2)
- Section 1983 Liability (50)
- Senior Housing (19)
- Setback Requirement (2)
- Short Term Rentals (2)
- sign (1)
- Signs (186)
- Site Plan Review (54)
- SLAPP Suits (3)
- Smart Growth (14)
- solar energy (10)
- Special Facts Exception (1)
- Special Use/Exception (188)
- Spot Zoning (34)
- Standards of Review (21)
- Standing (172)
- Statewide Planning (1)
- Statute of Limitations (60)
- Straddled Parcels (3)
- Student Housing (6)
- Subdivision Regulation (94)
- Takings (256)
- Time of Application Rule (1)
- Transfer of Development Rights (6)
- Uncategorized (429)
- Uniformity (2)
- Urbanism (1)
- Utilities (1)
- Vagueness (5)
- Variances (342)
- Vested Rights (82)
- Voting (8)
- Wind Development (66)
- Wireless Communications (147)
- Younger Abstention Doctrine (1)
- Zoning – Interpretation (129)
- Zoning Administration (28)
- Zoning Boards of Appeal (8)
- Zoning Map (5)
- Zoning-Adopting/Amending (20)
Archives
Blogroll
- Agricultural Law
- Bulldozers at Your Doorstep
- Climate Law Blog
- Community Benefits Agreements
- Endangered Species Act Law Blog
- Environmental Justice – EPA
- Environmental Justice Blog
- Envirosphere
- Gideon’s Trumpet
- Green Building Law Blog
- Green Building Law Update
- Green Law Blog
- Green Real Estate Law
- Hawaii Land Use Law
- IMLA Blog
- Impact Fees.com
- Inverse Condemnation
- Land Use Law Professor Blog
- Land Use, Environmental and Real Estate Law in California
- Lay of the Land – CA
- LI Land Use and Zoning
- Massachussetts Land Use Monitor
- Midwest Planning BLUZ
- National Eminent Domain Blog
- New Jersey Condemnation Law
- New Jersey Land Use Law
- New York Legal Update
- New York Zoning and Municipal Law Blog
- NJ Eminent Domain Law
- North Carolina Legal Landscapes
- North Carolna Land Use Litigator
- Northwest Land Law Forum
- NY Times City Room:Land Use Planning
- Open Space – Vermont Land Use Law & Policy
- Preservation Law Digest
- Property Professor Blog
- Rhode Island Property Law
- RLUIPA Defense
- Scenic America Blog
- SCOTUSblog
- Teaching Climate Change Law & Policy
- The Eminent Domain Law Blog
- The Florida Land Environment
- Touro Law Institute on Land Use and Sustainable Development Law Blog
- Tucson Land Use Law
- Utah Office of Property Rights Ombudsman
- Vermont Environmental and Land Use Law Blog
- Warming Law
- Wind Power Law
Disclaimer
This blog is provided for general informational purposes only. It should not be construed as legal advice and is not intended to be a substitute for legal counsel. Persons requiring legal advice should retain a properly licensed lawyer. No attorney-client relationship will be formed based on use of this site and any comments or posts to this blog will not be privileged or confidential.
BLOG STATS
