Archive for the ‘Condemnation/Eminent Domain’ Category
NY Appellate Court Finds Highest and Best Use of Parcel that was Condemned and Adjoining Parcel was Light Industrial Use, Not Retail Development of Maximum Allowable Density
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on January 6, 2018
HI Supreme Court Upholds Decision to Allow a County Real Estate Appraiser to Testify Regarding What Would be Considered an Economically Beneficial Use
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on October 19, 2017
CT Supreme Court Finds Inverse Condemnation after City takes Adjoining Parking Lot through Eminent Domain
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on July 6, 2017
NY Appellate Court Holds Village Not Required to Select Alternative Sites under Eminent Domain Law When Taking Property for Public Parking
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on May 14, 2017
NY Appellate Court Holds Claimant’s De Facto Taking Claim was Untimely
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on December 18, 2016
NY Appellate Court Finds Highest and Best Use of Condemnee’s Real Property Following Rezoning was 12-Story Budget Hotel
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on October 13, 2016
CA Supreme Court Holds Requirements of “Essential Nexus” and “Rough Proportionality” were Questions for the Court Requiring Inquiry into Sincerity and Reasoned Planning Decisions
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on October 1, 2016
Second Circuit Court of Appeals Affirms Dismissal of Inverse Condemnation and Vagueness Claim
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on November 8, 2015
CA Appeals Court Finds Eminent Domain Proceeding Did Not Trigger a Division of Land Under the Subdivision Map Act
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on November 3, 2015
NY Appellate Court Finds County’s Valuation of Property in Question In Partial Taking Condemnation Proceeding was Inadequate
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on August 7, 2015
