Archive for the ‘Transfer of Development Rights’ Category
NY Appellate Court Reverses Holding that Transferrable Development Rights Were Marketable and Had Value
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on November 2, 2021
VT Supreme Court Reverses Finding that Transfer of Development Rights Bylaw was Unconstitutionally Vague
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on September 6, 2020
PA Appeals Court Upholds Board’s Application of Ordinance in Finding the Baseline for Determining the Number of Transferable Development Rights Necessary for Development
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on February 12, 2020
4th Circuit Court of Appeals Holds Landowner Failed to State Viable Constitutional Claims Against Local Entities Based on Zoning Actions
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on December 2, 2018
NY Appellate Court Finds Transfer of Development Rights Component of Town Comprehensive Plan is Void and Unenforceable
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on April 22, 2018
Fed. Dist. Court of MD Finds Landowner Did Not Have a Property Interest Created by the Recommendations of a Master Plan, Despite Reliance on Them
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on August 25, 2017
OR Appeals Court Finds That Plan District Regulation Governing Density Transfers Was Not Exclusive Means For Density Transfers
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on May 15, 2014
Oregon Land Conservation Development Department Issues TDR Rules for Pilot Program on Forest Land Conservation
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on April 25, 2010
No Property Interest in a State-Issued Certificate of Operation for Adult Home
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on January 3, 2010
Washington State Enacts New Regional TDR Law
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on July 11, 2009
LAW OF THE LAND 