Archive for the ‘Variances’ Category
NY Appellate Court Upholds Requirement for Use Variance and Conditions for Dog Training Facility and Finds it is not a Home Occupation
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on August 23, 2019
NY Appellate Court Holds ZBA’s Determination to Grant the Application for an Area Variance to Allow Zero Feet of Road Frontage for the Subject Parcels had a Rational Basis
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on August 16, 2019
PA Appeals Court Rejects Claims Arising from the Denial of a Special Exception and Variance for the Construction of a Freestanding Antenna Support Structure In Lieu of a Monopole Support Structure for a Telecommunications Facility
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on August 14, 2019
NY Appellate Court Upholds Zoning Board’s Denial of Application to Change Nonconforming Use to Another Nonconforming Use and for Area Variance
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on August 9, 2019
NY Appellate Court Reinstates Lawsuit Challenging Variance Denials
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on July 8, 2019
DE Supreme Court Holds City was Free to Adopt Stricter Standards for Variance Grants Than Those Under the State Law Governing Municipal Boards of Adjustment
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on June 25, 2019
TN Court of Appeals Finds the Fact that No Construction Could Occur on Three Lots Due to Stormwater Regulations Did Not Constitute Exceptional Hardship for Variance
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on June 18, 2019
OH Appeal Court Holds “Practical Difficulties” Standard for Area Variances was Properly Considered in the Denial of a Variance Application
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on June 3, 2019
NE Supreme Court Holds Substantial Evidence Supported Denial of a Variance Based on Unnecessary Hardship
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on May 30, 2019
NE Supreme Court Upholds Denial of Variance Based on Unnecessary Hardship
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on May 17, 2019
