Archive for the ‘Vested Rights’ Category
Fed. Dist. Court of Michigan Finds Plaintiffs Did Not Obtain a Vested Property Interest Because Their Nonconforming Use Did Not Comply with Prior Zoning Ordinance in Effect
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on November 28, 2022
DE Supreme Court Finds no Vested Right to Site Plan Approval
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on November 2, 2022
WA Appeals Court Finds that Permit Applications were Vested Pursuant to Development Agreement
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on September 17, 2022
GA Appeals Court Held that Landowner Had Vested Right to Develop Property with 9000-Square-Foot Lots
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on March 1, 2021
AL Supreme Court Find No Vested Rights to Fill Wetlands for Subdivision
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on January 9, 2021
IL Appeals Court Dismisses Land Use Claims Finding no Vested Right and Preclusion of Regulatory Takings Claim
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on January 2, 2021
CA Appeals Court Holds When Land is Governed by Both a Vesting Tentative Map and a Subsequent Development Agreement and the Terms Conflict, the Development Agreement Controls
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on December 6, 2020
NJ Supreme Court Holds That MLUL Prohibits a Municipality From Applying New Zoning Ordinances Within Two-Years of a Developer’s Rights Vesting
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on October 6, 2020
Fed. Dist. Court of WV Dismisses Due Process Claims Arising from No-Contest Plea Deal Regarding a Raze and Repair Order
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on September 24, 2020
California Court of Appeal Holds Developer’s Right to Proceed with Project Since it Vested Before Passage of City Initiative
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on September 8, 2020