Archive for the ‘Development Agreements’ Category
WA Appeals Court Finds that Permit Applications were Vested Pursuant to Development Agreement
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on September 17, 2022
AZ Appeals Court Affirms Original Development Agreement Preserves Current Owner’s Vested Right to Mine and Trumps the Rezoning Ordinance and Amendment to Development Plan
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on November 15, 2021
Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals Rejects Developer’s Claims of Retaliation Against City Manager Following Termination of Preliminary Development Incentive Agreement
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on February 6, 2021
MD Court of Appeals Holds Developer Could Not Enforce Recoupment Agreement Entered into by Mayor
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on January 30, 2021
Fed. Dist. Court of SC Dismisses Evangelical Church’s Claims Arising from a Denial of Building Permits
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on August 17, 2020
CA Appeals Court Holds Vesting Tentative Maps Did Not Supersede Subsequent Development Agreement
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on June 8, 2020
TX Appeals Court Upholds City’s Immunity Defense in Development Agreement Litigation
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on October 31, 2018
MD Court of Special Appeals Holds Development Rights and Responsibilities Agreement Froze a Broad Scope of Local Laws
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on January 14, 2017
Utah Supreme Court Further Clarifies Line Between Legislative and Administrative Action in Action involving Ordinance Approving Amended Development Agreement
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on November 15, 2012
CA Dist. Court Concludes Town Must Pay-Up after Repudiating Development Agreement
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on January 21, 2011
LAW OF THE LAND 