Archive for the ‘Takings’ Category
Fed. Dist, Court of NV Holds Takings Claims Brought Under § 1983 Do Not Have an Implicit Administrative Exhaustion Requirement 
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on September 14, 2021
10th Cir. Court of Appeals Concluded the Developer Did Not Satisfy the Finality Requirement for its Takings Claims and Dismissed for the Lack of Prudential Ripeness
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on August 1, 2021
U.S. SUPREME COURT FINDS REQUIRED ACCESS TO FARMWORKERS ON PRIVATE LANDS TO BE A PHYSICAL TAKING
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on July 31, 2021
U.S. SUPREME COURT APPLIES KNICK “FINALITY” PROVISIONS TO NINTH CIRCUIT DECISION INVOLVING RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY CONVERSIONS
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on July 30, 2021
Fed. Dist. Court of IL Determines Recylcing Facility’s Takings Claim was Unripe
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on June 30, 2021
Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals Concluded City’s Rezoning of Property After Developer Invested $3.5M Constituted a Regulatory Taking Without Just Compensation
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on June 21, 2021
Fed. Dist. Court of AZ Concluded Rejection of Conditional Use Permit Extension Did Not Constitute a Compensable Taking
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on June 15, 2021
GA Appeals Court Concluded the Setback Requirements Did Not Constitute a Regulatory Taking by the City
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on May 21, 2021
11th Circuit Court of Appeals Concluded a Requirement to Obtain a Permit for Farming Activities Did Not Constitute a Regulatory Taking and Found No Due Process and Equal Protection Violations
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on April 8, 2021
Fed. Dist Court of TX Holds Takings Claims Were Unripe
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on April 4, 2021
