Archive for the ‘Zoning – Interpretation’ Category
UT Appeals Court Holds that Drive-In Restaurant was Permitted in Central Business District
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on March 3, 2023
OH Supreme Court Held that Column Headings in Schedule for Zoning Resolution Regulating Number of Off-Street Parking Spaces Had to be Read Substantively, Rather than as a Guidepost
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on February 21, 2023
MA Land Court Interprets Overlapping Zoning Definitions for Hot Tubs and Swimming Pools
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on January 26, 2023
WA Court of Appeals Finds Policy in City’s Comprehensive Plan Regarding Commercial Uses in Industrial Areas Did Not Apply to Centers and Shelters
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on January 9, 2023
MA Supreme Judicial Court Finds Undeveloped Parcel Had Necessary Frontage to Support Permit Approval
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on October 31, 2022
NC Appeals Court Emphasizes the Importance of Clear Zoning Provisions When Ruling in Favor of Permitting a Digital Billboard
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on September 16, 2022
DE Supreme Court Finds Zoning Code Ambiguous as to Gross Floor Area Calculation
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on September 3, 2022
OK Appeals Court Focuses on Distinction Between Commercial and Recreational Vehicles and an RV Classified as Both Following Variance Denial
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on August 9, 2022
GA Supreme Court Holds Landowners’ Prior Mandamus Suit About Land Disturbance Permit was Not Identical to Current Suit for Res Judicata Purposes 
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on June 4, 2022
VT Supreme Court Holds Structure was a Boathouse and not an Accessory Use and Remands Matter
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on November 9, 2021
LAW OF THE LAND 