Archive for the ‘Comprehensive Plan’ Category
IA Appeals Court Upholds Board’s Decision to Rezone Portion of Property from Agricultural to Light Industrial
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on February 19, 2024
FL Appeals Court Holds Organization’s Allegations Concerning Land Use Documents and Provisions Not Incorporated into County’s Comprehensive Plan Could Not Be Raised in a Challenge Under the Consistency Statute
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on March 17, 2023
WA Court of Appeals Finds Policy in City’s Comprehensive Plan Regarding Commercial Uses in Industrial Areas Did Not Apply to Centers and Shelters
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on February 8, 2023
WA Court of Appeals Finds Policy in City’s Comprehensive Plan Regarding Commercial Uses in Industrial Areas Did Not Apply to Centers and Shelters
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on January 9, 2023
WA Appeals Court Addresses Public Facilities Requirement for Comprehensive Plan
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on October 21, 2022
LA App. Court Finds Challenges to Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance Unripe
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on October 10, 2022
NY Appellate Court Sends Back Zoning Amendments for SEQRA Compliance but Finds Rezoning Determination was in Compliance with Comprehensive Plan and Finds no Conflicts of Interest
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on August 1, 2022
RI Supreme Court Holds City Council Decision to Approve Zoning Amendment was Entitled to Legislative Deference and the Presumption That It was in Accordance with the Comprehensive Plan
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on July 31, 2022
Florida Appellate Court Dismisses Challenge to Comprehensive Plan Consistency Statute Because Appellants Failed to Name Proper Defendant
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on June 12, 2022