Archive for the ‘Comprehensive Plan’ Category
NJ Appeals Court Holds Statute Did Not Require a Governing Body to Affirmatively Act in Response to a Master Plan Recommendation
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on February 12, 2015
DC Court of Appeals Remands Case Based on Failure of Commission to Adequately Explain Its Conclusions
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on September 12, 2014
NY Appellate Court Finds Rezoning Does Not Amount to Impermissible Spot Zoning as it is Consistent with the City’s 2020 Vision Plan
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on March 3, 2014
NY Appellate Court Holds Proposed “Affordable” Development Substantially Complies with “Master Plan” and Does Not Constitute Impermissible Spot Zoning
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on March 2, 2014
NY Appellate Court Finds Local Law Addressing Corner Lots is Constitutional, In Accordance with Comprehensive Plan and Does Not Constitute Spot Zoning
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on December 30, 2013
NY Appellate Court Upholds Town’s Renewals of Grandfathering Provisions
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on December 26, 2013
DC Court of Appeals Upholds PUD as Consistent with Comprehensive Plan
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on October 22, 2013
FL Appeals Court Holds Expedited Power Plant Siting Rules Did Not Preempt Tribal Comprehensive Plan Challenge
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on August 31, 2013
Missouri Supreme Court Upholds Redevelopment Plan Pursuant to State TIF Act Finding it is Consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, Complied with Financing Standards and Allegation of Lack of Specificity of Project was Raised Too Late
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on July 24, 2013
Miss. Appellate Court Affirms Grant of Variances and Rezone for PUD, finding Record Supported Permit
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on November 7, 2012
