Archive for the ‘Comprehensive Plan’ Category
Fed. Dist. Court of MD Finds Landowner Did Not Have a Property Interest Created by the Recommendations of a Master Plan, Despite Reliance on Them
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on August 25, 2017
MD Court of Appeals Finds Master Plan Invalid as Amendments Should Have Been Sent Back to Planning Board for Written Comment
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on July 9, 2017
ME Supreme Judicial Court Holds City Council’s Decision to Rezone Property was in Basic Harmony with Comprehensive Zoning Plan
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on March 21, 2017
FL Appeals Court Reverses Order Permanently Enjoining Skydiving Business
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on February 2, 2017
CA Supreme Court Finds City Abused Its Discretion in Interpreting General Plan to Permit Residential Development
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on January 12, 2017
DC Court of Appeals Vacates Approval of Application for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) on Historic Site Due
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on December 26, 2016
OR Appeals Court Finds Hearing Officer Improperly Construed County Comprehensive Plan Policy as Permitting Preclusion of Complete Application of Rezoning Factors
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on November 19, 2016
WA Supreme Court Holds Board had Discretion to Decide Whether or Not to Declare a Comprehensive Plan Invalid, After Finding Noncompliance with Growth Management Act
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on November 18, 2016
NY Appellate Court Reverses Grant of Summary Judgment Finding Village Comprehensive Plan and Portions of the Zoning Amendments Void and Unenforceable
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on April 23, 2016
