Archive for the ‘Environmental Review’ Category
NY Appellate Court Holds Planning Board did not make a Reasoned Elaboration of Its Basis for Determining that a Second SEIS was not Necessary for Proposed Zoning Amendment and Site Plan Approval
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on August 24, 2017
NY Appellate Department Holds Court Should Have Declined to Accept, Without a Revised Review, Contention that Project Should be Classified as a Type II Action Under SEQRA
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on July 15, 2017
NY Appellate Court Finds Petitioners were Within the Zone of Interest Protected by SEQRA and Had Standing to Seek Judicial Review Without Pleading and Proving Special Damage
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on June 12, 2017
NY Appellate Court Affirms Holding that Water District’s Proposed Construction Plan was a Type II Action Not Subject to Review under the State Environmental Quality Review Act
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on June 10, 2017
NY Appeallate Court Denies Appeal to Annul the Negative Declaration Issued By Respondent City of Buffalo Planning Board under the State Environmental Quality Review Act
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on May 5, 2017
NYS Department of Environmental Conservation Proposes Changes to SEQR to Streamline the Process
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on March 8, 2017
NY Appellate Court Finds Board of Trustee’s Action under SEQRA and Adoption of Zoning Amendment was Ripe for Judicial Review
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on February 11, 2017
CA Appeals Court Finds Ordinance Regarding Medical Marijuana Facilities did not Constitute a Project Within the Meaning of CEQA
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on October 31, 2016
NY Appellate Court Reverses Grant of Summary Judgment Finding Village Comprehensive Plan and Portions of the Zoning Amendments Void and Unenforceable
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on April 23, 2016
Fed. Dist. Court in NY Dismisses Takings Claims as Unripe in Ongoing Annexation Case
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on April 12, 2016
