Archive for the ‘Section 1983 Liability’ Category
Fed. Dist Court of FL Holds in Question Involving Whether Home Was Being Used as a Religious Institution in Violation of City Zoning, Court Holds Special Magistrate is a Final Policymaker Whose Actions May Subject City to Liability Under Section 1983
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on July 24, 2023
NY Appellate Court Holds Adjacent Landowner’s Vague and Conclusory Allegations Regarding Alleged Conspiracy Between Plaintiffs and Town Officials Were Insufficient to State §1983 Claim
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on October 7, 2022
Fed. District Court MI Denies Summary Judgement in Retaliation Case Arising from Objections to Tree Ordinance
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on June 7, 2022
Fed. Dist, Court of NV Holds Takings Claims Brought Under § 1983 Do Not Have an Implicit Administrative Exhaustion Requirement 
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on September 14, 2021
Third Cir. Cour of Appeals Holds Plaintiff Failed to Allege that Property Developers were State Actors Subject to sec. 1983 Liability
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on July 1, 2021
Sixth Circuit CA Holds Plaintiff Had a Constitutionally Protected Property Interest to Construct a Residential Hotel
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on December 14, 2020
Second Circuit Finds Section 1983 and 1985 Claims Over Zoning Enforcement were Time Barred
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on August 6, 2020
6th Cir. Court of Appeals Holds Adult Entertainment Club Failed to State a Claim Under §1985 for Conspiracy to Violate Civil Rights
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on March 21, 2020
Fed Dist. Court in LA Grants Dismissal of Challenges to Zoning Change of Plaintiff’s Property
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on January 28, 2020
CA Appeals Court Holds Hearing Officer’s Authority to Make Zoning Decision Exposed City to § 1983 Liability
Posted by: Patricia Salkin on January 25, 2020
LAW OF THE LAND 