Intervenor Huckleberry Propane & Oil, LLC, appealed an order of the Superior Court reversing a decision of the planning board for the defendant, the Town of Wilmot, to grant Huckleberry’s site plan application. The site plan application at issue was for a propane and fuel oil distribution facility, which would contain four 30,000-gallon propane storage tanks, one 20,000-gallon heating oil tank, one 10,000-gallon kerosene tank, and a forty-foot by eighty-foot garage with five bays. The plaintiffs were five individuals who lived on Chase Pond, which was downstream from the proposed facility. The only alteration that the New Hampshire Department of Transportation (DOT) required of Huckleberry was to pave the end of the driveway. The town’s fire chief also recommended that the driveway be paved for the entire depth of the property in order to provide greater road stability for fuel trucks and a safer entry and exit to and from the property.
The final plans submitted by Huckleberry complied with these requirements, and provided that the pavement specifications would comply with town standards. The board also conditioned its approval upon the access road being “designed to withstand the weight of fully loaded trucks and tankers,” and being “maintained at all times to ensure access by emergency vehicles.” The trial court reversed the board’s finding that Huckleberry had made adequate provisions for traffic circulation, entrances and exits, traffic flow, and compatibility with existing streets, faulting it for “not requiring traffic studies or engineering analysis regarding the impact truck traffic may have on traffic safety on Route 11.”
On appeal, the court found that in reversing the board’s finding that Huckleberry had made adequate provisions for traffic circulation, entrances and exits, traffic flow, and compatibility with existing streets, the trial court improperly engaged in de novo review of the record. Here, nothing in the site plan regulations required the applicant to conduct a traffic study. Additionally, the board considered a traffic study, as well as evidence concerning the present use of the access road by large trucks and the number of anticipated trips by trucks under Huckleberry’s proposed use, in assessing whether Huckleberry had made adequate provisions for traffic circulation, entrances and exits, traffic flow, and compatibility with existing streets. The record also indicated that the town’s fire chief worked closely with Huckleberry’s fire safety consultant, as well as with the State Fire Marshal’s Office, in analyzing and recommending fire protection measures to be implemented in the design of the proposed facility. Huckleberry incorporated all of the recommendations of the fire chief and the State Fire Marshal’s Office in its proposed design. Accordingly, the court reversed the trial court’s order reversing the board’s approval of the application.
Ware v Town of Wilmot, 2017 WL 2350437 (NH 5/30/2017)
Posted by: Patricia Salkin | June 17, 2017
NH Supreme Court Upholds Site Plan Application for a Propane and Fuel Oil Distribution Facility
Posted in Site Plan Review, Uncategorized
Categories
- Access to Government
- Accessory Uses
- ADA
- Adequate Public Facilities Ordinances
- Adirondacks
- Adult Entertainment Facilities
- Aesthetics
- Affordable Housing
- Aging
- Agricultural Uses
- Airports
- Alcohol Sales
- Alienation of parkland
- Amending Zoning
- animals
- Annexation
- Antitrust
- Architectural Review Board
- Authority to Zone
- Big Box/Formula Retail
- Book Reviews
- Brownfields
- Building Codes
- Building Permit
- Cemeteries
- Climate Change
- Collateral Estoppel
- Comprehensive Plan
- Condemnation/Eminent Domain
- Conditions on Approval
- Conservation Easements
- Constructive Approval
- Consultants
- Contract Zoning
- COVID
- Current Caselaw
- Current Caselaw – New York
- Density Bonus
- Development Agreements
- Development Rights Agreements
- Discrimination
- Drones
- Dual Zone Parcel
- Due Process
- Easements
- Educational Use
- Endangered Species
- Energy
- Enforcement
- Environmental Justice
- Environmental Review
- Equal Protection
- Equitable Estoppel
- Ethics
- Exactions
- Exclusionary Zoning
- Exemption from Zoning
- Extraterritorial Jurisdiction
- Fair Housing Act Amendments
- Family
- Federal Preemption
- Fees
- FHA
- Financing
- first amendment
- Floating Zones
- Flood Control
- FOIL
- Food Trucks
- Formula Retail
- Fourth Amendment
- Fracking
- GIS
- Growth Management
- Hearings
- Highways and Roads
- Historic Preservation
- Home Occupations
- Homeland Security
- Host Community Agreements
- Hours of Operation
- Housing
- Immunity
- Impact Fees
- Incentive Zoning
- Inclusionary Zoning
- Intergovernmental Conflicts
- inverse condemnation
- Junkyards
- Laches
- Marcellus Shale Gas Drilling
- Mediation
- Medical Marijuana
- Mining
- Mobile Homes
- moratoria
- New Legislation
- Non-Conforming Uses
- Notice
- Nuisance
- Oceans
- official map
- Overlay Zone
- Paper Streets
- Pine Barrens
- Planned Development Districts
- Players in the Land Use Game
- Preemption
- Procedural Issues
- Bonds
- Certiorari
- Consent Decree
- Declaratory Relief
- Estoppel
- Final Decisions
- Findings
- Injunctive Relief
- Intervention
- Judicial Abstention
- Jurisdiction
- Legislative vs Adjudicatory
- Mandamus
- Mootness
- Necessary Parties
- Notice of Decision
- Prior Precedent
- Referral Requirements
- Res Judicata
- Rooker-Feldman Doctrine
- Time of Application Rule
- Property Rights
- Public Trust Doctrine
- Purchase of Development Rights
- qualified immunity
- Redevelopment
- Referenda
- Regional Planning
- Religious Uses – Non-RLUIPA
- Remedies
- Residency Restrictions
- Restrictive Covenants
- Rezoning
- Ripeness
- RLUIPA
- Second Amendment
- Section 1983 Liability
- Senior Housing
- Setback Requirement
- Short Term Rentals
- sign
- Signs
- Site Plan Review
- SLAPP Suits
- Smart Growth
- solar energy
- Special Facts Exception
- Special Use/Exception
- Split Lots
- Spot Zoning
- Standing
- Statewide Planning
- Statute of Limitations
- Straddled Parcels
- Student Housing
- Subdivision Regulation
- Takings
- tatoo parlors
- Transfer of Development Rights
- Uncategorized
- Urbanism
- Utilities
- Variances
- Various Uses
- Vested Rights
- Waivers
- Wetlands
- Wind Development
- Wireless Communications
- Younger Abstention Doctrine
- Zoning – Interpretation
- Zoning Administration
- Zoning Boards of Appeal
- Zoning Map
- Zoning-Adopting/Amending
Leave a comment