This post was authored by Matthew Loeser, Esq.
W.R. Meriwether, Factors and Drayage, LLC, and Gregory P. Thompson each owned parcels of real property that adjoined a 10-acre piece of property owned by the Fire Authority. All three parcels were located in the Town of Pike Road. Pursuant to a Pike Road zoning ordinance, the parcels were located in an area zoned for “low density, single-family residential development.” After the Fire Authority planned to build a fire station on its 10-acre parcel, Meriwether and Thompson sought a judgment declaring that the Fire Authority was subject to the referenced zoning ordinance and that constructing a fire station on its property would be a violation of that ordinance. In this case, Meriwether and Thompson appealed from adverse judgments entered by the Montgomery Circuit Court.
On appeal, appellees’ claimed that because the Fire Authority engaged in functions that could be described as traditionally “governmental” in nature, it was a governing body or political subdivision for purposes of the exemption from the zoning ordinance. The court found that although the members of the Fire Authority’s board of directors were chosen by the Montgomery County Commission, they could not be officers of the state or of any county or municipality, but were instead required to be “duly qualified electors of the county. Moreover, the legislature would have specifically granted the exemption from zoning regulation if it intended to do so, given the significance of a blanket exemption from zoning regulation that would have resulted in the unfettered use and development of property without regard to a comprehensive land-use plan. Absent a specific exemption from zoning regulation, the court held the Fire Authority was required to comply with the zoning ordinance affecting the property it possessed.
As the Fire Authority did not qualify as a body entitled to an exemption from zoning regulation, the court reversed the trial court’s judgments and remanded the case for further proceedings.
W.R. Meriwether, Factors and Drayage, LLC v. Pike Road, 2019 WL 2482324 (AL 6/14/2019)
Posted by: Patricia Salkin | July 2, 2019
AL Supreme Court Holds Fire Authority Did Not Qualify as a Body Entitled to an Exemption From Zoning Regulation
Posted in Immunity, Intergovernmental Conflicts, Uncategorized
Categories
- Access to Government
- Accessory Uses
- ADA
- Adequate Public Facilities Ordinances
- Adirondacks
- Adult Entertainment Facilities
- Aesthetics
- Affordable Housing
- Aging
- Agricultural Uses
- Airports
- Alcohol Sales
- Alienation of parkland
- Amending Zoning
- animals
- Annexation
- Antitrust
- Architectural Review Board
- Authority to Zone
- Big Box/Formula Retail
- Book Reviews
- Brownfields
- Building Codes
- Building Permit
- Cemeteries
- Climate Change
- Collateral Estoppel
- Comprehensive Plan
- Condemnation/Eminent Domain
- Conditions on Approval
- Conservation Easements
- Constructive Approval
- Consultants
- Contract Zoning
- COVID
- Current Caselaw
- Current Caselaw – New York
- Density Bonus
- Development Agreements
- Development Rights Agreements
- Discrimination
- Drones
- Dual Zone Parcel
- Due Process
- Easements
- Educational Use
- Endangered Species
- Energy
- Enforcement
- Environmental Justice
- Environmental Review
- Equal Protection
- Equitable Estoppel
- Ethics
- Exactions
- Exclusionary Zoning
- Exemption from Zoning
- Extraterritorial Jurisdiction
- Fair Housing Act Amendments
- Family
- Federal Preemption
- Fees
- FHA
- Financing
- first amendment
- Floating Zones
- Flood Control
- FOIL
- Food Trucks
- Formula Retail
- Fourth Amendment
- Fracking
- GIS
- Growth Management
- Hearings
- Highways and Roads
- Historic Preservation
- Home Occupations
- Homeland Security
- Host Community Agreements
- Hours of Operation
- Housing
- Immunity
- Impact Fees
- Incentive Zoning
- Inclusionary Zoning
- Intergovernmental Conflicts
- inverse condemnation
- Junkyards
- Laches
- Marcellus Shale Gas Drilling
- Mediation
- Medical Marijuana
- Mining
- Mobile Homes
- moratoria
- New Legislation
- Non-Conforming Uses
- Notice
- Nuisance
- Oceans
- official map
- Overlay Zone
- Paper Streets
- Pine Barrens
- Planned Development Districts
- Players in the Land Use Game
- Preemption
- Procedural Issues
- Bonds
- Certiorari
- Consent Decree
- Declaratory Relief
- Estoppel
- Final Decisions
- Findings
- Injunctive Relief
- Intervention
- Judicial Abstention
- Jurisdiction
- Legislative vs Adjudicatory
- Mandamus
- Mootness
- Necessary Parties
- Notice of Decision
- Prior Precedent
- Referral Requirements
- Res Judicata
- Rooker-Feldman Doctrine
- Time of Application Rule
- Property Rights
- Public Trust Doctrine
- Purchase of Development Rights
- qualified immunity
- Redevelopment
- Referenda
- Regional Planning
- Religious Uses – Non-RLUIPA
- Remedies
- Residency Restrictions
- Restrictive Covenants
- Rezoning
- Ripeness
- RLUIPA
- Second Amendment
- Section 1983 Liability
- Senior Housing
- Setback Requirement
- Short Term Rentals
- sign
- Signs
- Site Plan Review
- SLAPP Suits
- Smart Growth
- solar energy
- Special Facts Exception
- Special Use/Exception
- Split Lots
- Spot Zoning
- Standing
- Statewide Planning
- Statute of Limitations
- Straddled Parcels
- Student Housing
- Subdivision Regulation
- Takings
- tatoo parlors
- Transfer of Development Rights
- Uncategorized
- Urbanism
- Utilities
- Variances
- Various Uses
- Vested Rights
- Waivers
- Wetlands
- Wind Development
- Wireless Communications
- Younger Abstention Doctrine
- Zoning – Interpretation
- Zoning Administration
- Zoning Boards of Appeal
- Zoning Map
- Zoning-Adopting/Amending
Leave a comment